CSI+Script

media type="custom" key="4714831"

**Danielle Simeone CSI case**
= :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :(: :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :( :(:( :( =

=
**Rubric for Podcasts**
 * My name is Detective Danielle. Two weeks ago I was called to a crime scene a 2 bedroom 1 bath room beach house. The alleged victim was Felixe Navidad he was not well liked and was left with alot of money for his pearnts who died in a bad case. The suspect guilty of committing this crime is Kendra she did this because she wanted his money from his will. This suspect's guilt was confimed through the testing and results of evidence collected at the crime scene. The most incriminating piece of evidence was her finger prints on his cup. The evidence was found at scen 7 in a cup. The test performed was PH Test .(Fingerprint) The results of the test were that there was some thing that possioned Felixe .(What fingerprints did you find on the cups you examined) This connects the suspect to the crime because her hand prints were on her cup when we matched them. The next piece of evidence collected was a pice of cardboord with inprints. It was found at scenc 8 . The test performed was an DNA test (Handwriting test). The results of the test were tah Kendra rote it but said it was from Vera. This connects the suspect to the crime because we asked them to write for us so we can see how they write so we matched it to the catdboord and foung it was her writing.Another piece of evidence collected was powder on shoe and ice tray. It was found at scene 1. The test performed wasPh test. The results of the test were that the powder on the shoe was on the ice tray. This connects the suspect to the crime because we tested it with bandain and both on the shoe and on the ice tray tured green. The last piece of evidence collected was Cola. It was found at scenc 5. The test performed was Ph Cola test. The results of the test were that it had something in it .(How do you know? What was the ph of regular cola compared to the Ph in Felix's cup?) This connects the suspect to the crime because she was handling his cup. According to the evidence, the following is an account of the events believed to have gone down on that fateful day (This was supposed to be a step-by-step list of how Kendra committed the crime.). BeTherefore, Kendra committed the crime of Finger prints and Ph testing. What motived this person to do this? She did this for Felixe's will. **======


 * ** CATEGORY ** ||   || ** Exemplary **  ||   || ** Proficient **  ||   || ** Partially Proficient **  ||   || ** Incomplete **  ||   || ** POINTS **  ||


 * ** Introduction ** ||  || ** 3 points ** ||   || ** 2 points ** ||   || ** 1 points ** ||   || ** 0 points ** ||   || ||

introduction. Provides relevant information and establishes a clear purpose engaging the listener immediately. ||  || **__ Describes the topic and engages the audience as the introduction proceeds. __** ||  || Somewhat engaging (covers well-known topic), and provides a vague purpose. ||  || Irrelevant or inappropriate topic that minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction or the purpose is vague and unclear. ||  ||
 * || Catchy and clever


 * **__ Tells who is speaking, date the podcast was produced, and where the speaker is located. __** ||   || Tells most of the following: who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  ||   || Alludes to who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  ||   || Speaker is not identified. No production date or location of the speaker is provided.  ||


 * ** Content ** ||  || ** 6 points ** ||   || ** 4 points ** ||   || ** 2 points ** ||   || ** 0 points ** ||   || ||


 * || The motive was detailed and clearly based on information delivered throughout the investigation. ||   || __**The motive is detailed and based on partial information delivered throughout the investigation.**__  ||   || The motive is not very detailed and is sprinkled with inaccurate information.  ||   || The motive is missing, or unclear or all information is inaccurate.  ||   ||


 * || Four pieces of strong evidence were presented and linked to the suspect in an organized, methodical manner. ||   || __** Three or four pieces of evidence were presented and/or linked to the suspect in a somewhat organized, thoughtful manner.  **__ ||   || Two pieces of shaky evidence were presented and/or loosely linked to the suspect. Lack of organization.  ||   || One to no pieces of unimportant evidence were presented in an unorganized manner.  ||   ||


 * The events in the scenario are detailed, extremely organized and strongly supported with evidence and facts related to the crime scene. ||   || The events in the scenario are well organized, somewhat detailed, and supported with evidence from the crime scene. ||   || __**The events in the crime scene lack organization, detail, and are weakly supported with evidence from the crime scene.**__ ||   || There was no clear direction and evidence was unimportant. ||


 * Conclusion clearly summarizes key information. ||   || Conclusion summarizes information.  ||   || __**Conclusion vaguely summarizes key information**__  ||   || No conclusion is provided.  ||


 * ** Delivery ** ||  || ** 3 points ** ||   || ** 2 points ** ||   || ** 1 point ** ||   || ** 0 points ** ||   || ||


 * || Well rehearsed, smooth delivery in a conversational style. ||   || **__Rehearsed, smooth delivery__**.  ||   || Appears unrehearsed with uneven delivery.  ||   || Delivery is hesitant, and choppy and sounds like the presenter is reading.  ||   ||


 * Highly effective enunciation and presenter's speech is clear and intelligible, not distant and muddled. Expression, and rhythm keep the audience listening. ||  || **__Enunciation, expression, pacing are effective throughout the podcast.__**  ||   || Enunciation, expression, rhythm are sometimes distracting during the podcast.  ||   || Enunciation of spoken word is distant and muddled and not clear. Expression and rhythm are distracting throughout the podcast.  ||


 * Correct grammar is used throughout the podcast. ||   || **__Correct grammar is used during most of the podcast.__**  ||   || Occasionally incorrect grammar is used during the podcast.  ||   || Poor grammar is used throughout the podcast.  ||


 * ** Graphic and Music Enhancements ** ||  || ** 3 points ** ||   || ** 2 points ** ||   || ** 1 points ** ||   || ** 0 points ** ||   || ||


 * || **__Music enhances the mood, quality, and understanding of the presentation.__** ||   || Music provides supportive background to the podcast.  ||   || Music provides somewhat distracting background to the podcast.  ||   || Music is distracting to presentation.  ||   ||


 * **__All music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared with appropriate documentation.__** ||   || Music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared.  ||   || Use of copyrighted works is questionable.  ||   || Copyright infringement is obvious.  ||


 * ** Technical Production ** ||  || ** 3 points ** ||   || ** 2 points ** ||   || ** 1 points ** ||   || ** 0 points ** ||   || ||


 * || **__ Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment without background noise and distractions. __** ||   || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment with minimal background noise and distractions.  ||   || Presentation is recorded in a semi-quiet environment with some background noise and distractions.  ||   || Presentation is recorded in a noisy environment with constant background noise and distractions.  ||   ||


 * || **__ Transitions are smooth and spaced correctly without noisy, dead space. __** ||   || Transitions are smooth with a minimal amount of ambient noise.  ||   || Transitions are uneven with inconsistent spacing; ambient noise is present.  ||   || Transitions are abrupt and background noise needs to be filtered.  ||   ||


 * **__Volume of voice, music, and effects enhance the presentation.__** ||   || Volume is acceptable.  ||   || Volume is occasionally inconsistent.  ||   || Volume changes are highly distracting.  ||


 * **__Podcast length keeps the audience interested and engaged.__** ||   || Podcast length keeps audience listening.  ||   || Podcast length is somewhat long or somewhat short to keep audience engaged.  ||   || Podcast is either too long or too short to keep the audience engaged.  ||

74% ||
 * ** TOTAL POINTS ** ||   || 42/57